← Back to Blog

The Bioinformatics Hiring Crisis Is Unsolvable

Chirag, Founder of Pipette.bio

Feb. 4, 2026

The bioinformatics hiring crisis is unsolvable.

Not pessimism. Math.

There are roughly 60,000 bioinformatics scientists in the United States right now.[1] Over the next decade, the Bureau of Labor Statistics projects we'll need about 7,900 new ones, accounting for growth and retirements.

Meanwhile, US universities award approximately 1,800 degrees in bioinformatics and computational biology per year.[2] Sounds like enough, right?

Except those graduates aren't evenly distributed. They cluster in Boston, San Diego, and New York. And they get absorbed by pharma, big tech, and well-funded startups before they ever consider the academic lab in Nebraska or the biotech startup in Portugal.

Training a competent bioinformatician takes years. You need programming skills, statistical knowledge, domain expertise in biology, and the hard-won intuition that comes from debugging pipelines at 2 AM. That's not a 6-month bootcamp. That's a PhD plus postdoc, or a decade of self-teaching on the job.

Meanwhile, Sequencing Got Cheap

Really cheap.

In 2001, sequencing a human genome cost $95 million.[3] By 2022, it was $525. Today it's approaching $200, with some platforms claiming sub-$100 at scale.[4]

That's a 99.99% cost reduction in two decades. Nothing else in technology has dropped that fast—not even computing power following Moore's Law.

Every lab can generate data now. A single-cell experiment produces terabytes. A modest clinical study might have hundreds of samples.

Data generation scaled exponentially. The humans who can analyze it didn't.

The Consequences

So what happens when every lab can generate data but can't analyze it?

Labs share one bioinformatician across five projects. Postdocs wait months for their data to reach the front of the queue. PIs pay $30,000 for a CRO to run an analysis that takes two weeks of actual compute time. Grad students spend a year learning to code instead of doing the science they came for.

The bottleneck isn't going away. You can't train people fast enough. You can't pay enough to poach from industry. You can't scale humans.

The Only Way Out

The only way out is to change what requires a human in the first place.

That's what Pipette is. Not a tool that helps bioinformaticians work faster. A platform that lets biologists do their own analysis without becoming bioinformaticians.

Upload your data. Describe your experiment and goals in plain English. Get results—with full Python and R code, publication-ready figures, and a written report.

The hiring crisis is unsolvable. The analysis bottleneck isn't.

Sources

  1. CareerExplorer estimates approximately 60,400 bioinformatics scientists in the US, with 7,900 projected openings over 10 years based on growth and retirements. CareerExplorer: Bioinformatics Scientist Job Market
  2. Data USA reports approximately 1,826 completions in Biomathematics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology in 2023, concentrated in public 4-year institutions. The majority are Master's degrees. Data USA: Biomathematics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology
  3. The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) tracks sequencing costs at funded genome sequencing centers. Their data shows costs of approximately $95 million per genome in 2001, dropping to $525 by 2022. NHGRI: DNA Sequencing Costs Data
  4. Illumina's NovaSeq X series, launched in 2023, achieves approximately $200 per genome. MGI's DNBSEQ-T20x2 claims sub-$100 at scale. Labiotech: The Past, Present, and Future of Genome Sequencing