How to Use AI Agents in Biology: A Practical Guide
How to give a scientific AI agent the right context, audit its decisions, preserve provenance, and tell whether its conclusions are supported.
Read the guidePractical guides to the concepts behind biological data analysis, plus reproducible workflows, infrastructure, validation studies, and product notes from Pipette.bio.
The newest practical guides, research notes, and product writing from the Pipette.bio team.
How to give a scientific AI agent the right context, audit its decisions, preserve provenance, and tell whether its conclusions are supported.
Read the guideHow genome-wide markers and historical field trials can help breeding programs decide what to test, cross, and advance next.
Read the guideFocused, practical explanations of the concepts researchers meet in real analyses—written to answer one question clearly and connect it to the right workflow.
Training populations, GEBVs, realistic validation, genotype-by-environment interaction, hybrid prediction, and breeding decisions.
→How the R and Python single-cell ecosystems differ in workflow design, scale, integration, machine learning, and statistical analysis.
→How ranked-list GSEA differs from GO over-representation analysis—and when each method answers the better biological question.
→How sequencing depth, gene length, and the downstream question determine which expression measure to use.
→Architecture, planning systems, workflow orchestration, scientific context, and the operational problems behind reproducible biological analysis.
Compare AI bioinformatics agents with Nextflow, Snakemake, WDL, CWL, and Galaxy—and learn when each model fits the work.
Read the comparisonHow biologists can specify an analysis, review consequential decisions, verify scientific integrity, and recognize warning signs in agent-generated work.
→How a directed knowledge graph derived from the literature supports Pipette’s planning agent and can be queried through MCP.
→An argument for scaling analytical capacity through better infrastructure rather than relying on hiring alone.
→Where general coding assistants help, where bioinformatics asks for more structure, and why Pipette takes a domain-specific approach.
→An evidence-based guide to how scientific AI agents plan, use tools, execute bioinformatics workflows, fail, and remain accountable to human review.
→Dataset reanalysis, workflow selection, method coverage, and practical guides grounded in concrete biological analysis.
A reanalysis of raw RNA-seq data from a published salt-stress study, including the automated workflow and reproduced findings.
Read the reanalysisA practical overview of genomic prediction, QTL mapping, plant GWAS, imputation, and population-structure workflows.
Read the workflow guideRelease notes and product decisions covering the workspace, planning, analysis capabilities, recovery, and reporting.
Pipette.bio can now search and summarize scientific papers, answer questions about completed reports, support more specialized genomics workflows, and handle long-running analyses more reliably.
→